The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
-
[email protected]
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:24 am
The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
Dear stko
I have built a model of shield tunnel in liquefied soil layer. It does not converge in the first step of gravity analysis. I do not know where the problem is. The following is an introduction to the model
1. First of all, I choose binding constraint for the contact between tunnel and soil: equalDOF (X, Y direction)
2. The left and right boundaries of the soil layer are also bound in the way of equalDOF, (X direction)
3. Fix at the bottom of soil layer (X and Y directions)
4. The degree of freedom of pore pressure at the top of soil layer is fixed
Can you help me?
My gravity analysis cannot converge. I will attach my model below. Can you help me modify it?
I have built a model of shield tunnel in liquefied soil layer. It does not converge in the first step of gravity analysis. I do not know where the problem is. The following is an introduction to the model
1. First of all, I choose binding constraint for the contact between tunnel and soil: equalDOF (X, Y direction)
2. The left and right boundaries of the soil layer are also bound in the way of equalDOF, (X direction)
3. Fix at the bottom of soil layer (X and Y directions)
4. The degree of freedom of pore pressure at the top of soil layer is fixed
Can you help me?
My gravity analysis cannot converge. I will attach my model below. Can you help me modify it?
- Attachments
-
- zou.zip
- (191.02 KiB) Downloaded 154 times
Re: The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
UP elements cannot be analyzed in static analyses due to how the pore pressure DOF is implemented.
Therefore, if you have to run a "static" analysis, you must do it with a Transient analysis and a large time step so that you don't have inertia effects
Therefore, if you have to run a "static" analysis, you must do it with a Transient analysis and a large time step so that you don't have inertia effects
-
[email protected]
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:24 am
Re: The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
Thank you stko I have modified my model,
but after the gravity analysis (elastic phase), I open the post-processing module and cannot display my post-processing. What is the reason?
(The post-processing of other models can be displayed normally when I open them)
page 1 is my model post-processing results
Here is my modified model
but after the gravity analysis (elastic phase), I open the post-processing module and cannot display my post-processing. What is the reason?
(The post-processing of other models can be displayed normally when I open them)
page 1 is my model post-processing results
Here is my modified model
- Attachments
-
- zou (2).zip
- (191.09 KiB) Downloaded 154 times
-
- 4.png (87.83 KiB) Viewed 2739 times
-
[email protected]
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:24 am
Re: The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
Dear stko
Im sorry
please download this model
The above model was sent incorrectly
Im sorry
please download this model
The above model was sent incorrectly
- Attachments
-
- zou (2).rar
- (1.86 MiB) Downloaded 160 times
Re: The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
the top layer of soil is detached from the other one. It is falling down.
Select the 2 soil layer, merge them using the SewFaces command, and re-mesh. The analysis should run after that
Select the 2 soil layer, merge them using the SewFaces command, and re-mesh. The analysis should run after that
-
[email protected]
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:24 am
Re: The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
Thank you very much! i will try again!
and i want to ask a question,
In the phase of gravity elasticity analysis, I used a long analysis step(5step 5000totally time)
In the gravity plastic analysis stage,If I still use the analysis step size of (5 steps, a total time of 5000s), the analysis cannot converge, so I use the analysis step size of (40 steps, a total time of 2s) to calculate the convergence, is this correct?
and i want to ask a question,
In the phase of gravity elasticity analysis, I used a long analysis step(5step 5000totally time)
In the gravity plastic analysis stage,If I still use the analysis step size of (5 steps, a total time of 5000s), the analysis cannot converge, so I use the analysis step size of (40 steps, a total time of 2s) to calculate the convergence, is this correct?
Re: The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
It should be fine. Just record the acceleration and check if they are small enough
-
[email protected]
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2022 10:24 am
Re: The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
ok,that is small enough
and i have an another question
if I want to extract the shear strain and shear stress of the soil element in the post processing. In the two-dimensional XY model, what I should extract?is the Gaussian point ε 12 and σ 12?
and i have an another question
if I want to extract the shear strain and shear stress of the soil element in the post processing. In the two-dimensional XY model, what I should extract?is the Gaussian point ε 12 and σ 12?
Re: The non-convergence of gravity analysis in two-dimensional tunnel modelis
yesif I want to extract the shear strain and shear stress of the soil element in the post processing. In the two-dimensional XY model, what I should extract?is the Gaussian point ε 12 and σ 12?