Prestressing
-
AntoMarinelli
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 am
Prestressing
Dear STKO team,
I'm modelling a prestressed beam with a I section. I have an equal area of 1260mm2 in the bottom part and 280 mm2 in the upper part, as it is shown in the picture. The initial stress is 999MPa. I evaluated the moment induced by prestressing (not considering the selfweight) and it is equal to -349 kNm. Considering that the test is a four point bending test, the force that produce a moment equal to the prestressing one is 170 kN (M=P*a where a = 2.05). Infact, form the experimental curve at 170 kN the displacement become positive (second picture).
In the STKO curve the displacement become positive at 371 kN and I don't understand the reason.
I attached the section, the curve and the model.
(The centroid is at 395 mm and the concrete cover is 50mm ).
Thanks in advance
Regards
Antonella
I'm modelling a prestressed beam with a I section. I have an equal area of 1260mm2 in the bottom part and 280 mm2 in the upper part, as it is shown in the picture. The initial stress is 999MPa. I evaluated the moment induced by prestressing (not considering the selfweight) and it is equal to -349 kNm. Considering that the test is a four point bending test, the force that produce a moment equal to the prestressing one is 170 kN (M=P*a where a = 2.05). Infact, form the experimental curve at 170 kN the displacement become positive (second picture).
In the STKO curve the displacement become positive at 371 kN and I don't understand the reason.
I attached the section, the curve and the model.
(The centroid is at 395 mm and the concrete cover is 50mm ).
Thanks in advance
Regards
Antonella
- Attachments
-
- Sezione600.5.png (29.74 KiB) Viewed 3262 times
-
- HF600.5.rar
- (222.81 KiB) Downloaded 176 times
-
- GraficoHF600.5.PNG (27 KiB) Viewed 3266 times
-
marafini.f
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 1:52 pm
Re: Prestressing
Dear Antonella,
I would check your concrete characteristics. The numerical response seems to be matching the experimental one, so I think all the considerations you made in terms of geometry are correct. I would suggest you check your concrete stiffness, is it coherent with the stress and strain relationship you defined. I think it's a bit high but you should make an attempt with a lower number and check the graph again.
Let me know how it goes.
Francesca
I would check your concrete characteristics. The numerical response seems to be matching the experimental one, so I think all the considerations you made in terms of geometry are correct. I would suggest you check your concrete stiffness, is it coherent with the stress and strain relationship you defined. I think it's a bit high but you should make an attempt with a lower number and check the graph again.
Let me know how it goes.
Francesca
-
AntoMarinelli
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 am
Re: Prestressing
Dear Francesca,
I have already performed the analysis that you suggested considering E=36000 MPa and not the direct value proposed for C60 class (40700 MPa). The changes in the final curve are negligible. Maybe I have lo lower it again but it doesn't make physical sense because the concrete is a High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete so the Elastic Modulus is around the value that I set. Moreover, the software does not allow to lower much than 30 GPa.
What could be the solution?
Thank you
Regards
Antonella
I have already performed the analysis that you suggested considering E=36000 MPa and not the direct value proposed for C60 class (40700 MPa). The changes in the final curve are negligible. Maybe I have lo lower it again but it doesn't make physical sense because the concrete is a High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete so the Elastic Modulus is around the value that I set. Moreover, the software does not allow to lower much than 30 GPa.
What could be the solution?
Thank you
Regards
Antonella
- Attachments
-
- Grafico HF600.5.PNG (31.03 KiB) Viewed 3252 times
-
marafini.f
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 1:52 pm
Re: Prestressing
What about self-weight?
There isn't any in your model
There isn't any in your model
-
AntoMarinelli
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 am
Re: Prestressing
I didn't model the self weight because the curve does not consider it. I have also performed a manual checking and the self weight generates a positive moment of 15.40kN which not affect so much the final moment.
The problem is that the change of displacement sign could happen at 171 kN independently from the E modulus because the system is isostatic.
Thank you for the support
Antonella
The problem is that the change of displacement sign could happen at 171 kN independently from the E modulus because the system is isostatic.
Thank you for the support
Antonella
-
marafini.f
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 1:52 pm
Re: Prestressing
Did you try modeling your problem initially all elastic and checking the result against your hand calculations?
Also could you send me the excel file with you graph so I can make an attempt
Also could you send me the excel file with you graph so I can make an attempt
-
AntoMarinelli
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 am
Re: Prestressing
Yes, sure!
This is the excel with experimental results.
Thanks
This is the excel with experimental results.
Thanks
- Attachments
-
- Experimental results HF600.rar
- (12.43 KiB) Downloaded 182 times
-
AntoMarinelli
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 am
Re: Prestressing
Dear Francesca,
I performed the attemp that you suggested. The first linear branch does not change. I can match the experimental curve with an half of E, but as I said before it doesn't have physical meaning. I have checked all the geometry and it seems ok.
I don't know what could be still the problem..
Thanks for the support
Antonella
I performed the attemp that you suggested. The first linear branch does not change. I can match the experimental curve with an half of E, but as I said before it doesn't have physical meaning. I have checked all the geometry and it seems ok.
I don't know what could be still the problem..
Thanks for the support
Antonella
-
marafini.f
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 1:52 pm
Re: Prestressing
Dear Antonella,
so if you calibrate your concrete parameters correctly with respect to the C60 High-Performance Fiber Reinforced concrete then that's not the mistake.
I would suggest you recheck everything restarting with a linear model, including the geometry in both directions, and see if you can recreate the linear stiffness of your experiment.
Let me know if you have any progress I am sorry we couldn't help more.
Francesca
so if you calibrate your concrete parameters correctly with respect to the C60 High-Performance Fiber Reinforced concrete then that's not the mistake.
I would suggest you recheck everything restarting with a linear model, including the geometry in both directions, and see if you can recreate the linear stiffness of your experiment.
Let me know if you have any progress I am sorry we couldn't help more.
Francesca