Pushover Analysis

Post Reply
Gabriele.Neri
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:14 am

Pushover Analysis

Post by Gabriele.Neri » Fri May 10, 2024 4:11 pm

Dear STKO team,
I'm trying to perform a pushover analysis in the following model.
I'm getting always the same issue (represented in the image called "Foto 1"), and I can't get the capacity curve ( as it's shown in the image called "Foto 2")

Can you help me?

Thanks in advance
Attachments
Prova_pushover.zip
(192.69 KiB) Downloaded 163 times
foto 2.png
foto 2.png (31.57 KiB) Viewed 1688 times
foto 1.png
foto 1.png (76.99 KiB) Viewed 1688 times

STKO Team
Posts: 3066
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:45 am

Re: Pushover Analysis

Post by STKO Team » Mon May 13, 2024 8:30 am

There are some mistakes in your file.

The first 2 I saw are:
  1. Your gravity analysis is Displacement-controlled in Ux. Why? it should be a regular load control analysis.
  2. Why are you discretizing each member in multiple finite elements while using the Hinge Radau Integration scheme?
    This is wrong. Just use 1 element if you want to use the Hinge integration

Gabriele.Neri
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:14 am

Re: Pushover Analysis

Post by Gabriele.Neri » Mon May 13, 2024 9:30 am

Thanks for the advice! I've changed from displacement control to load control. I was using displacement control in order to catch the post-peak behaviour.
Concerning the 2 point I can't understand what you wrote.. in the model I have well-defined plastic hinge length, in order to consider them properly in STKO I have to use Hinge-Radau scheme.

STKO Team
Posts: 3066
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:45 am

Re: Pushover Analysis

Post by STKO Team » Tue May 14, 2024 8:13 am

I was using displacement control in order to catch the post-peak behaviour
Ok, if you expect a softening behavior already at the stage of gravity load you can use Disp-Control, but in that case you have to control the vertical displacement, not the horizontal one.
Concerning the 2 point I can't understand what you wrote.. in the model I have well-defined plastic hinge length, in order to consider them properly in STKO I have to use Hinge-Radau scheme.
What I mean is:
Imagine you have a column whose total height is 3 mt. Then you define a plastic hinge length of 0.3 m. That is fine if you use a single FE for your column, so you will have 5 gauss points, of which the first and the last will be 0.3 m and the remaining will span the remaining 2.4 m of the column.
But if you discretize your beam in multiple FE, each one will have their own plastic hinges (I,.e. 2 hinges per FE).
Furthermore, as you discretize your column, the FE size will be too small to contain those 2 plastic hinges.

Gabriele.Neri
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 9:14 am

Re: Pushover Analysis

Post by Gabriele.Neri » Tue May 14, 2024 1:27 pm

Now I understood, thanks for the support!

STKO Team
Posts: 3066
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:45 am

Re: Pushover Analysis

Post by STKO Team » Wed May 15, 2024 8:17 am

You're welcome

Post Reply