About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
Dear STKO Team,
I was studying the model from Massiomos' last Webinar. I've changed the mesh as he described during the webinar. But when I ran I got the error like below. What am I doing wrong? Attached are the error and the model.
P.S. I sent an email on Monday, I wonder if you've received it.
Thank you
Oguzhan
I was studying the model from Massiomos' last Webinar. I've changed the mesh as he described during the webinar. But when I ran I got the error like below. What am I doing wrong? Attached are the error and the model.
P.S. I sent an email on Monday, I wonder if you've received it.
Thank you
Oguzhan
- Attachments
-
- mytry3d.rar
- (1.06 MiB) Downloaded 173 times
-
- domain errorJPG.JPG (132.66 KiB) Viewed 3741 times
Re: About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
Hello STKO Team,
I solved the problem, I forgot to add selection sets for monitor soil base and top...
Now It's running. You can ignore the post. But I'm still waiting for your response to my email.
Have a great weekend.
Oğuzhan
I solved the problem, I forgot to add selection sets for monitor soil base and top...
Now It's running. You can ignore the post. But I'm still waiting for your response to my email.
Have a great weekend.
Oğuzhan
-
marafini.f
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 1:52 pm
Re: About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
Dear Oguzhan,
we are glad you found a solution to your problem.
I will get information on the status of your email request.
Have a good day.
Francesca
we are glad you found a solution to your problem.
I will get information on the status of your email request.
Have a good day.
Francesca
Re: About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
Dear Francesca,
Thank you for your reply.
About the model, I run it and I got the Warnings as below. I did as the instruction led me. And I checked -ICNTL14 box in dynamic analysis, left it as default for ICNTL14 Value as 200.
I successfully ran the analysis. Actually, computation time was less than before. (when I ran the Massimo's model with finer meshes in the middle of the model without checking ICNTL14 it took 21 hours, my model with ICNTL14 Value as 200 took 13 hours)
But I don't know what I am doing with this -ICNTL14 value.
Could you please explain what it means? Thank you
Regards,
Oğuzhan
Thank you for your reply.
About the model, I run it and I got the Warnings as below. I did as the instruction led me. And I checked -ICNTL14 box in dynamic analysis, left it as default for ICNTL14 Value as 200.
I successfully ran the analysis. Actually, computation time was less than before. (when I ran the Massimo's model with finer meshes in the middle of the model without checking ICNTL14 it took 21 hours, my model with ICNTL14 Value as 200 took 13 hours)
But I don't know what I am doing with this -ICNTL14 value.
Could you please explain what it means? Thank you
Regards,
Oğuzhan
- Attachments
-
- ErrorL.JPG (237.08 KiB) Viewed 3728 times
-
marafini.f
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 1:52 pm
Re: About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
ICTL14 attribute controls the "percentage increase in the estimated working space"
If it's equal to 20 for example, It means you are telling the solver that it can increase the allocated space for the analysis by maximum of 20 times, it is a way to avoid OpenSees saturating your compute memory. How large is your model?
If it's equal to 20 for example, It means you are telling the solver that it can increase the allocated space for the analysis by maximum of 20 times, it is a way to avoid OpenSees saturating your compute memory. How large is your model?
Re: About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
Sometimes the MUMPS solver requires more memory than what it initially estimates.
the ICNTL value allows you to increase the amount of memory MUMPs can allocate
the ICNTL value allows you to increase the amount of memory MUMPs can allocate
Re: About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
I see, It's 200 meters, cubic 3D-solid model. So it is about memory.marafini.f wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 10:21 amICTL14 attribute controls the "percentage increase in the estimated working space"
If it's equal to 20 for example, It means you are telling the solver that it can increase the allocated space for the analysis by maximum of 20 times, it is a way to avoid OpenSees saturating your compute memory. How large is your model?
Re: About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
So, it doesn't affect the result?
Computation time decreased almost in half when using 200 as the ICNTL value.
Is it normal?
Re: About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
No, it doesn't. It's just about solving the linear system of equations. If it fails, it will give an error (no result), it won't lead to a wrong result.So, it doesn't affect the result?
Yes, because when MUMPS fails in solving the system of equations, it will result in a non-convergent step, so OpenSees will try to cut the time step and try again.Computation time decreased almost in half when using 200 as the ICNTL value.
Is it normal?
Anyway, it typically happens when the model is highly non-linear, so the solver needs to do a lot of PIVOTING in the factorization of the system, but our example about the 3D model should be elastic... what model are you referring to?
Re: About the 3D model from the New Element Presentation - ASDAbsorbingBoundary
Yes, it is actually elastic, but I'm not using the one you uploaded. I remodelled the old model from the previous webinar as I was watching Massimo's last webinar. I built finer meshes in the center like a + symbol as Massimo described.
And I thought the warning was because of me meshing finer so it was computationally cumbersome.
I attached the model. By the way, thank you very much for your replies.
And I thought the warning was because of me meshing finer so it was computationally cumbersome.
I attached the model. By the way, thank you very much for your replies.
- Attachments
-
- mytry3d.rar
- (1.06 MiB) Downloaded 193 times