Search found 22 matches
- Tue May 05, 2026 9:13 pm
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Shell model for tsunami load
- Replies: 3
- Views: 386
Re: Shell model for tsunami load
Regarding on this topic, I want to clarify that my structure is modelled with the macromodeling approach (bricks and mortar as a homogeneuos material). So, I want to ask you: do I need to reduce the transversal shear stress with respect of the in-plane shear stress (by means of using ortrothopic ...
- Mon Jan 05, 2026 4:25 pm
- Forum: Analysis
- Topic: Convergency issues in a CM Building
- Replies: 6
- Views: 416
Re: Convergency issues in a CM Building
But in a dynamic analysis like the one I am performing, do i need to add mass density + vertical loads? or with mass density is enough?
- Tue Dec 30, 2025 7:32 pm
- Forum: Analysis
- Topic: Convergency issues in a CM Building
- Replies: 6
- Views: 416
Re: Convergency issues in a CM Building
Oh, I thought that adding a mass density in the ASDConcrete3D materiales would be enough. Always I need to add the FaceForce aswell?
- Fri Dec 19, 2025 1:51 pm
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Shell model for tsunami load
- Replies: 3
- Views: 386
Shell model for tsunami load
Hi,
I would like to know whether the model attached to this message (confined masonry walls modeled using a macromodeling approach) is suitable for tsunami loads in a dynamic analysis, specifically regarding out-of-plane behavior. In particular, I have some doubts related to the following points ...
I would like to know whether the model attached to this message (confined masonry walls modeled using a macromodeling approach) is suitable for tsunami loads in a dynamic analysis, specifically regarding out-of-plane behavior. In particular, I have some doubts related to the following points ...
- Tue Nov 25, 2025 1:38 am
- Forum: Analysis
- Topic: Convergency issues in a CM Building
- Replies: 6
- Views: 416
Re: Convergency issues in a CM Building
Hi again!
Before your response, I want to make an update below: I have been trying a lot of changes in the model like the use of EnergyIncr as convergency criteria, adding viscosity in the ASDConcrete3D materials, using the TRBDF2 integrator instead Newmark 0.5 0.25, among others. With this changes ...
Before your response, I want to make an update below: I have been trying a lot of changes in the model like the use of EnergyIncr as convergency criteria, adding viscosity in the ASDConcrete3D materials, using the TRBDF2 integrator instead Newmark 0.5 0.25, among others. With this changes ...
- Tue Nov 18, 2025 8:42 pm
- Forum: Analysis
- Topic: Convergency issues in a CM Building
- Replies: 6
- Views: 416
Convergency issues in a CM Building
Hi STKO Team!
I want to ask about a convergency issue that I am dealing in a confined masonry structure subjected to acceleration recording in the X and Y directions. In the document CM Building that I attach you can find this STKO model with the planes of the structure which were the used ...
I want to ask about a convergency issue that I am dealing in a confined masonry structure subjected to acceleration recording in the X and Y directions. In the document CM Building that I attach you can find this STKO model with the planes of the structure which were the used ...
- Thu Jul 10, 2025 12:45 am
- Forum: Analysis
- Topic: Tolerance & testCommand
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1924
Tolerance & testCommand
Dear STKO,
As part of my master's thesis, I would like to make a sensibility analysis about the analysis setup in a shear wall model. The main attributes that I want to evaluate are the testCommand and tolerance. The modifications that I would like to make are the following ones:
- testCommand ...
As part of my master's thesis, I would like to make a sensibility analysis about the analysis setup in a shear wall model. The main attributes that I want to evaluate are the testCommand and tolerance. The modifications that I would like to make are the following ones:
- testCommand ...
- Wed Jul 09, 2025 4:06 pm
- Forum: OpenSees MP
- Topic: Partitions & OpenSeesMP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5467
Re: Partitions & OpenSeesMP
Ok, I will prove that if this solves the issue.
For my model, what could be a good number for the alphaS and alphaM parameters for Penalty Method? I read in other responses in the forum that alphaS = alphaM = 10^(8 + oom), with oom = round(log10(K)). My model uses shell elements with a 50x50 mm ...
For my model, what could be a good number for the alphaS and alphaM parameters for Penalty Method? I read in other responses in the forum that alphaS = alphaM = 10^(8 + oom), with oom = round(log10(K)). My model uses shell elements with a 50x50 mm ...
- Mon Jun 30, 2025 11:22 pm
- Forum: OpenSees MP
- Topic: Partitions & OpenSeesMP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5467
Re: Partitions & OpenSeesMP
I will reply the questions:
This is strange, to speedup debugging this issue, could you tell me 1) what did you change between the 2 runs that gave different results? and 2) what result did you check? so I will focus on that
1) There is no difference between the models, I just run the model a ...
This is strange, to speedup debugging this issue, could you tell me 1) what did you change between the 2 runs that gave different results? and 2) what result did you check? so I will focus on that
1) There is no difference between the models, I just run the model a ...
- Mon Jun 23, 2025 3:28 pm
- Forum: Analysis
- Topic: Combination between test commands
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1978
Combination between test commands
Hi!
I want to ask if it is possible to combine two test commands in STKO, as in OpenSees or other softwares? For example, is it possible to use RelativeNormIncrTest + RelativeEnergyIncrTest?
Also, what are the recommendations about the best test commands to use in a non-linear static and dynamic ...
I want to ask if it is possible to combine two test commands in STKO, as in OpenSees or other softwares? For example, is it possible to use RelativeNormIncrTest + RelativeEnergyIncrTest?
Also, what are the recommendations about the best test commands to use in a non-linear static and dynamic ...