Dear STKOteam,
I have some questions regarding the PDMY material constitutive model and would appreciate your assistance:
1. Differences in Shear Contraction, Dilation, and Liquefaction Parameters
The parameters listed on your website differ from those in the main references, particularly for ...
Search found 124 matches
- Thu Jan 30, 2025 3:59 am
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Parameters for PDMY
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2009
- Thu Oct 31, 2024 12:51 pm
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Bounding Cam Clay Model
- Replies: 36
- Views: 8238
Re: Bounding Cam Clay Model
Thanks for your explanation!
I will make a comparison with the effect of whether there is initial displacement.
I will make a comparison with the effect of whether there is initial displacement.
- Wed Oct 30, 2024 11:33 am
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Bounding Cam Clay Model
- Replies: 36
- Views: 8238
Re: Bounding Cam Clay Model
During the tunnel construction process, the excavation area is initially larger than the tunnel itself. Before formal construction, this excavation area undergoes continuous deformation. To accommodate this, the gap between the constructed tunnel and the deformed excavation face is filled by ...
- Tue Oct 29, 2024 1:51 pm
- Forum: Property
- Topic: MultiaxialCyclicPlasticity with initial analysis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 365
MultiaxialCyclicPlasticity with initial analysis
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to use the MultiaxialCyclicPlasticity constitutive model for an initial analysis, but it’s not included in the OpenSees documentation for constitutive models. I found the source code for this model on GitHub. By default, the material stage is set to 2 (plastic stage), but I ...
I'm trying to use the MultiaxialCyclicPlasticity constitutive model for an initial analysis, but it’s not included in the OpenSees documentation for constitutive models. I found the source code for this model on GitHub. By default, the material stage is set to 2 (plastic stage), but I ...
- Mon Oct 28, 2024 12:13 pm
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Bounding Cam Clay Model
- Replies: 36
- Views: 8238
Re: Bounding Cam Clay Model
I think I understand your point.
However, if the soil in the second stage is replaced by a shield tunnel, can this approach achieve the same results as the initial analysis? Since the tunnel and the soil share a common boundary, it's important to consider that after the first stage of analysis, the ...
However, if the soil in the second stage is replaced by a shield tunnel, can this approach achieve the same results as the initial analysis? Since the tunnel and the soil share a common boundary, it's important to consider that after the first stage of analysis, the ...
- Fri Oct 25, 2024 8:38 am
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Bounding Cam Clay Model
- Replies: 36
- Views: 8238
- Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:49 am
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Bounding Cam Clay Model
- Replies: 36
- Views: 8238
Re: Bounding Cam Clay Model
The BoundingCamCly material needs "materialState" to enter the plastic stage.
Is there another method to conduct the initial analysis with BoundingCamCly material?
- Thu Oct 24, 2024 5:26 am
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Bounding Cam Clay Model
- Replies: 36
- Views: 8238
Re: Bounding Cam Clay Model
Yes, it works for a simple model.
However, for a relatively complex model, the BCC's convergence ability seems poor.
I've tried to change the test tolerance, gird size, and steps with the most robust Newton algorithm, even for the first elastic stage.
However, for a relatively complex model, the BCC's convergence ability seems poor.
I've tried to change the test tolerance, gird size, and steps with the most robust Newton algorithm, even for the first elastic stage.
- Tue Oct 22, 2024 2:01 pm
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Bounding Cam Clay Model
- Replies: 36
- Views: 8238
Re: Bounding Cam Clay Model
Dear STKOteam,
It's so weird!
I made a reloading cell test with a 1m×1m size, it worked well.
However, when I changed its' size to 200m×100m, it couldn't converge.
The two models have no difference except for the model size.
Could you help find out where the problem is?
Looking forward to your reply!
It's so weird!
I made a reloading cell test with a 1m×1m size, it worked well.
However, when I changed its' size to 200m×100m, it couldn't converge.
The two models have no difference except for the model size.
Could you help find out where the problem is?
Looking forward to your reply!
- Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:30 am
- Forum: Property
- Topic: Bounding Cam Clay Model
- Replies: 36
- Views: 8238
Re: Bounding Cam Clay Model
Thanks, this gives me a deeper understanding of the use of this constitutive model.
Best wishes!
Best wishes!